Storming the Bastille July 1789: Paris Mob Sets into Motion French Revolution
Michael Streich
At nine o’clock in the
evening on July 14, 1789, King Louis XVI received word at
The Bastille as the Symbol of
Royal Despotism
Historian Olivier Bernier
referred to the Bastille as a “symbol of royal despotism,” and in July 1789 it
was simply that, a symbol. In the process of being “phased out” by the government,
the Bastille held only seven men, none of them political prisoners. British
historian Simon Schama, in his book Citizens,
analyzes the many mythologies associated with the Bastille, perpetuated by
romanticist literature and art.
The fortress, built in the
late 14th Century, was garrisoned by 114 men, mostly veterans, under
the command of the marquis de Launay, described as “stupid, weak, and
indecisive.” The prison held no noteworthy inmates; the marquis de Sade had
been held there until a week before the Bastille fell. The seven prisoners
included four forgers, two madmen (one of whom thought that he was God), and an
accomplice in an assassination plot against King Louis XV.
The
The men and women that converged
on the Bastille on the morning of July 14th were the bourgeoisie,
shopkeepers, merchants, and artisans. Masters and journeymen were eventually
joined by soldiers. These were the “popular emotions”
No effort was made to
restrain the mob in the days before the attack on the Bastille. They had
acquired arms but lacked ammunition. The Bastille magazine, however, contained
cartridges. This was the object of the mob. All other considerations were
secondary.
Two deputations of the people
met with de Launay who treated them civilly, removed the cannon facing the
faubourg St. Antoine, a section of
The mob managed to break
through the main gate and stormed into the outer courtyard. Nervous defenders
opened fire on the mob below. Thinking they had been lured into a massacre, the
mob, now joined by soldiers that had brought cannon, began an all-out assault.
By 5:00 de Launay surrendered. The battle had taken two hours.
De Laurnay was taken to the
Immediate Results of the Fall
of the Bastille
British historian Albert
Goodwin writes that, “No other single event in the revolution had so many-sided
or far-reaching results as the fall of the Bastille.” The power of the king was
diminished; indeed, Louis XVI went to the Assembly to enlist their support in
healing the nation. In all official matters, absolutism – what was left of it,
capitulated.
Military forces, notably foreign
regiments, were withdrawn from the area of
Sources:
Olivier Bernier, Words of Fire, Deeds of Blood: The Mob, the
Monarchy, and the French Revolution (Boston: Little, Brown and Company,
1989)
Albert Goodwin, The French Revolution
Robert Darnton, The Kiss of Lamourette: Reflections in
Cultural History (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1990)
Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French
Revolution (
(First published in Suite101. Copyright owned by Michael Streich. All republishing subject to written approval)
No comments:
Post a Comment