Reign of Terror: French Revolution Devolves into Lawless Blood-letting
Michael Streich
The September Massacres of
1792 changed the direction of the French Revolution. Within the next two years,
a Reign of Terror would engulf
The Terror Begins in 1793
King Louis XVI was beheaded
January 21, 1793. Over the next months, radical Jacobins began to target the
Girondists, moderate leaders that opposed the program of the Jacobin
leadership. Toward that end, the Jacobins used crowd action, the violence of
the sans-culottes, average French
workers. Many of these Parisian workers had been effectively used during the
September Massacres.
At the same time, revolts
broke out in the countryside, most notably in the Vendee region where Girondist
support was strong. Rural areas loyal to Catholicism also saw an increase in
opposition to what historian Simon Schama called the “dictatorship of
On October 16th,
Marie Antoinette was beheaded, following a shameless trial that accused her,
among other things, of incest and participating in orgies with Swiss Guards.
Above all, however, the former queen represented monarchy, a hated institution
incompatible with the new revolutionary order. It was this general mentality
that, when applied to all former royalists, enabled mass executions of all
associated with the Old Regime.
The Final Year of Terror
As 1794 progressed, the
Committee of Public Safety had turned on its own. Jacques Danton, the force
behind the September Massacres, was denounced and, along with his friends,
beheaded. Fear gripped members of the Committee itself, each deputy afraid to
make eye contact with Robespierre, the messianic force behind the “republic of
virtue” and the Cult of the Supreme Being, for fear of being the next victim.
Everyday workers could be
denounced for any careless criticism or for invoking the royalist past. The
Reign of Terror, contrary to perception, resulted in the deaths of more
non-aristocrats than those with blue blood. Some scholars estimate that only
30% of those sent to the guillotine were aristocrats.
Even the leaders of the sans-culottes had been executed earlier
in the year. Historians speculate that Robespierre’s greatest weakness was his
lack of a base of support. He had no lieutenants and many of his former radical
colleagues had been denounced and executed. This made it possible for the
Committee to band together in July and send Robespierre to the guillotine,
ending the Terror.
The Lessons of the Reign of
Terror
Within a two year period, a
relatively small handful of revolutionary leaders commandeered the Revolution.
They did so by eliminating opposition groups, often using mob violence while
appealing to the ideal that the Revolution demanded the sacrifice of
individualism for the good of society. Once the mob had served its purpose, its
leaders too were executed.
Finally, the strongest
radicals to emerge turned on their colleagues, eliminating further opposition
and branding it as counterrevolutionary. Similar patterns would be seen in the
20th Century after the 1917 Russian Revolution as well as the
Spanish Civil War. In Nazi Germany, Hitler also employed similar tactics to
consolidate power. In many ways, the Reign of Terror is a case study in
obtaining and maintaining absolute power.
Sources:
Olivier Bernier, Words of Fire, Deeds of Blood: The Mob, the
Monarchy, and the French Revolution (Boston: Little, Brown and Company,
1989)
Albert Goodwin, The French Revolution (New York: Harper
& Brothers, 1962)
Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French
Revolution (
[First published in Suite101; copyright owned by Michael Streich. Republishing requires written permission]
No comments:
Post a Comment