Revolutionary Charleston Marks the Beginning of the End for British in Southern Campaign
Michael Streich June 29, 2009
By the end of 1779, Sir Henry
Clinton, British commander of North American forces during the latter part of
the Revolutionary War, turned his attention south, dispatching a sizeable force
to take Charleston.
The South Carolina
campaign, begun with much promise, rapidly deteriorated into a type of
guerrilla warfare with atrocities committed by both sides. Much of this was due
to Lord Cornwallis, the southern commander after Sir Clinton returned to New York.
Clinton Moves against Charleston,
South Carolina
According to Sir Henry
Clinton’s memoirs, the taking of Charleston
had long figured in his overall strategy to win the war against the American
rebels. Loyalist support was thought to be strongest in the South, notably in
the Carolinas. Finally, recent British
successes in Georgia
seemed to confirm a southern campaign might swiftly change the course of the
entire war.
Charleston was defended by 5,000 men, many from militia units,
under the command of Major General Benjamin Lincoln. (some sources cite the number
of defenders at 7,000) Clinton left New York with almost 100
ships under the command of Vice Admiral Arbuthnot and nearly 8,000 troops. His
second in command was Lord Cornwallis, who had only returned from England
following the death of his wife.
The Siege of Charleston
After suffering losses on the
seas, the British landed south of Charleston on
John’s Island. The siege would last 42 days.
General Lincoln, well aware that his forces could not successfully defend the
South’s largest city, made plans to evacuate the Continentals while escape was
still possible.
However, according to General
William Moultrie’s journal entry of April 26, 1780, leading Charleston citizens
threatened to open the gates to the city and “cut up his [Lincoln’s] boats,” if
he evacuated his troops. What some military historians call Lincoln’s decisive mistake probably resulted
in the largest single military defeat of the war.
At the same time Lt. Colonel
Banastre Tarleton’s “British Legion,” composed primarily of saber-wielding
cavalry, pacified the countryside, cutting off supply routes such as at
Biggin’s Bridge, north of Charleston. Admiral Arbuthnot’s warships easily
sailed past Forts Johnson and Moultrie. Charleston
would endure a relentless bombardment from both land and sea.
The fall of Charleston
Lincoln surrendered Charleston
on May 12, 1780. Although the Continentals were taken prisoner, civilians and
militia soldiers were allowed to return to their farms, some officers even
allowed to keep their swords. Clinton returned
to New York,
leaving Lord Cornwallis and 4,000 men. Before he left Charleston, however, Sir Henry Clinton issued
an order that was to prove fatal to the British cause.
Clinton, in essence, forced all provincial inhabitants to
take an oath of loyalty to the Crown or be branded as rebels. Militiamen that
had returned home viewed their repatriation as duplicity. Many neutral citizens
that had not taken sides were now forced into a decision. Clinton’s order was the first step in the
coming rural warfare that would culminate in some of the bloodiest atrocities
of the war.
The Second Fatal Blunder
The second blunder occurred
when Colonel Tarleton’s cavalry overtook the Virginia Infantry, commanded by
Colonel Buford. Buford was heading north to join rebel forces in North Carolina. The
encounter resulted in a bloodbath. Tarleton gave no quarter as surrendering men
were cut down with saber. The wounded were bayoneted.
This atrocity galvanized
Patriot forces in the Carolinas as men rushed
to join the opposition, including a young Andrew Jackson who had helped to
treat the few fortunate survivors of the massacre. Rebels attacked the homes
and wives of Loyalists; Tories and British raiding parties retaliated. Many
innocent civilians died. As historian Walter Edgar comments, the British
stirred up a hornet’s nest. Much of the blame rests with Cornwallis, who
allowed field commanders extensive freedom of movement and chose not to
intervene.
Sources:
Walter Edgar, Partisans and Redcoats: The Southern
Conflict That Turned the Tide of the American Revolution (HarperCollins,
2001)
Christopher Hibbert, Redcoats and Rebels: The American Revolution
Through British Eyes (New York: Avon Books, 1991)
The Spirit of Seventy-Six: The Story of the American
Revolution as Told by its Participants Edited
by Henry S. Commager and Richard B. Morris (Castle Books, 2002)
Copyright owned by Michael Streich. Contact Michael Streich for permission to republish. First published in Suite101.
No comments:
Post a Comment