Compromise of 1850 Merely Postponed the Civil War for a Decade
The 31st Congress was
called to order December 3, 1849. After weeks of sorting through petitions,
Henry Clay of Kentucky
presented eight resolutions designed to “settle and adjust amicably all
existing questions of controversy…arising out of the institution of slavery.”
The Senate began debating his resolution the following Tuesday, February 5,
1850. By the adjournment of the Senate that summer, the “Compromise of 1850”
was law, sectional tension was higher, and one of the great Senate thinkers,
John C Calhoun, had died.
The Resolutions of Henry Clay
California would be admitted as a free-soil state based on its
state constitution
Congress should not introduce
or “exclude” slavery in any of the new territories
The western boundary of Texas should conform to
the Rio del Norte
The U.S. government will pay Texas pre-annexation monetary claims
Texas will “relinquish…any claim which is has to any part
of New Mexico
Slavery will continue to
exist as an institution in the District of Columbia
as long as it exists in Maryland
The sale or slave trade
within the District will be abolished
A stronger “fugitive slave”
provision be enacted
Congress has “no power to
prohibit or obstruct the trade in slaves between slaveholding States…
Debating the Resolutions
Although Senator Clay
envisioned a compromise designed to give the North and the South some measure
of satisfaction, it stirred up a hornet’s nest of often angry debate. Many
senators proposed amendments favorable to their constituencies. Senator Pratt
of Maryland argued
for federal compensation to slaveholders that lost income resulting from
fugitive slaves. Jefferson Davis of Mississippi
favored extending the 1820 Missouri Compromise line to the Pacific.
John C. Calhoun, whose speech
was read by Virginia’s
Senator Mason, called for a constitution amendment establishing two sectional
Presidents. Calhoun, already frail, died in March. William Henry Seward’s
speech referred to a “higher law” that superseded the Constitution in terms of
slavery. Both Seward and Salmon Chase of Ohio urged the adoption of the Wilmot
Proviso. Stephen Douglas of Illinois
supported the resolutions in an attempt to assuage sectional discord. Although
representing a Northern state, Douglas owned
slaves himself through his second marriage.
Although President Zachary
Taylor urged the speedy admittance of California
into the Union, he opposed the expansion of
slavery into the other territories. According to Historian Frederick Merk, “Taylor would have met any southern move toward secession
at the head of the United
States army.” Taylor, however, died in July and the new
President, Millard Fillmore, supported the resolutions.
Results of the Compromise
Passage of the separate bills
was due in large part to the efforts of Stephen Douglas, who maneuvered the
legislation through Congress after Clay returned to Kentucky. Southerners, for the most part,
viewed the Compromise with disdain and in four southern states, conventions met
to consider secession.
Northerners also opposed
parts of the Compromise, most notably the new Fugitive Slave Act. Both New York and Wisconsin
attempted to nullify this act, without success. The issue of extending slavery
beyond those states in which the institution already existed would dominate
political and sectional thought for the next decade and act as a catalyst in
the eventual outbreak of war.
Sources:
William W. Freehling, The Road to Disunion: Secessionists at Bay
1776-1854 (Oxford University Press, 1990).
Frederick Merk, History of the Westward Movement (Alfred
A. Knopf, 1978).
Journal of the United States Senate, 31st
Congress, The Library of Congress,
“American Memory”
Written for Suite101 4/5/2009 by M. Streich who still holds the copyright.
No comments:
Post a Comment