Wednesday, April 1, 2026

This is taken from GOOGLE April 1, 2026: (first paragraph only)

 "U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth sparked controversy by leading a Christian prayer at the Pentagon on March 25, 2026, requesting "overwhelming violence" and that "every round find its mark" against enemies in the Iran war. The prayer, which also asked for "righteous targets," has been criticized for mixing religious rhetoric with military doctrine, raising concerns about the separation of church and state, and violating norms of military neutrality.."

On November 27, 1095 Pope Urban II made an impassioned speech, calling upon Christian Europe to take back land conquered by Muslims in the East. "God wills it," was his cry. It was the start of the first Crusade. 

This is no different from Current American Christian Nationalists like War Secretary Hegseth, who also identifies with the order of Knights Templar. This fascination extends to his tattoos, one of which states, "Deus Vult," meaning God will's it. He dares to invoke Jesus even as he prays for American bullets to hit their mark. 

Folks like Pete Hegseth do more wrong in the feeble and blind attempt to deliver a Crusade than projecting any Christian message of hope and redemption. This is not the "shining example" John Winthrop challenged the early Americans in 1630 to exemplify. They were to be a "city on a hill," a phrase often used afterward by leading Americans Like President Ronald Reagan.

The phrase came from Winthrop's sermon, "A model of Christian Charity." Is this really the Christian focus people like Hegseth want America to stand for? This Easter, can we celebrate the Risen Lord who conquered death as well as all the evils of the world? This is a direct contrast to the War Secretary's invoking of Jesus to justify his Crusade.

Winthrop's "city on a hill" borrowed from, Jesus' Sermon on the Mount and projected the idea of light shining through the darkness. The city was an example of Christian Charity. Individually, it was a call to live righteously, by example.

Fixed Income Lifestyle

Living on a Fixed Income and unable to work. When I first moved to this quiet complex in 2003, my rent was $500 for a two-bedroom, two-bath unit. I lived next door to my mother. It was at her insisting that I moved here even though I was not old enough Per the complex rules. But they made an exception. Now those rules have changed, my beloved mother died in 2012, and I am still living here, albeit paying a much higher rate - nearly $800.

I was put on Social Security disability in 2011 after spending nearly four weeks in the hospital battling esophageal varices, another heart attack, and weakened kidneys and liver. My cardiologist blamed it on stress. 

I am 73 now and still receiving Social Security as well as a very meager teaching pension (i taught for 11 years at a Catholic High School) but afterwards taught at several university campuses as an adjunct professor. Although they paid well, there were no benefits. It was the stress, I am told, of teaching 7-8 classes per semester and driving to and from three different campuses that did me in. Don't misunderstand: I loved teaching and still do. 

But now I am on Social Security and blog. My costs go up every year. Utilities follow higher rent. I no longer have a car. That dear little Cavalier broke down - a broken timing chain. The service shop wanted more money than I could afford, even with a Car Shield policy offering to pay $5000 for a new engine. All those months paying them $140 in vain. Advice: read the fine print and trust no promises.

So I have to order groceries and have them delivered. I tried several stores but Walmart seems to be the cheapest and most consistent. I also order certain things in Bulk: things I would normally have picked up on a weekly shopping trip.

Medications also have spiraled upwards, especially my inhalers. I've tried mail order pharmacies but even with no deductibles, the time from processing to date delivered can be long. And mail order pharmacies will not handle medications you must sign for such as Zolpidem. 

I've told family and friends I am no longer sending greeting or holiday cards. I like my cousin's idea: she sends animated e-cards and they are lovely. 

But even though I have tried to shed some monthly recurring costs, I still have credit card debt that used to be manageable. It will take me years to eliminate this debt and I've considered selling some assets such as art works I've inherited that I've priced on-line. I sold my substantial book collection in 2012, the same year my mother passed, for a pittance. My sister-in-law said "don't do it" but I didn't listen.

I have dozens and dozens of VHS tapes but no machine to play them on. Both my TV's crashed. I used my laptop and stream. I remember when I still had a car and had the freedom to go places. Now I am confined and depend upon "the kindness of strangers..."

But I hope this is not the final act of a long running show. I hope there is an epilogue That will be a bit more of a rainbow experience. 

Friday, March 20, 2026

Does anyone remember the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (August 1964)?  It was a document used by the Lyndon Johnson administration to fool Congress into giving the president a virtual blank check to flood Vietnam with thousands of American men and women in an effort to stop the spread of Communism (Containment theory). In the end, Vietnam was a disaster for America in many ways. 

Then there was Colin Powell At the United Nations trying to convince the world that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Again a lie that cost thousands of American lives. It might have been a start of what Donald Trump called "forever wars." Now he has begun his own forever war in the Middle East. But, not to worry, according to him, we have won and his will all be over soon - as thousands of Marines, boots on the ground, depart for the area.

But we love "splendid little wars" (John Hay). Too bad Mr. Trump is no Teddy, charging up San Juan Hill. Rather, he can be found on some golf course. 

Trump joked about Pearl Harbor but history has shown that 1941 was not a big surprise and that people like Winston Churchill, due to good intelligence, knew the hour and the day but chose to keep it to themselves. True or not, most wars in our history could have been avoided. Some were manufactured. Others relied on phony provocations. "Remember the Maine!"

Trump wants to walk away from Hormuz and let the Europeans pull his chestnuts out of the fire. Then why the Marines? Will the occupation of Kharg Island be the prelude for a march on Teheran? 

All of this is another example of tossing history to the waste bin of time. We do not learn. We will always repeat the catastrophes of the past.

Monday, December 29, 2025

So we try to find snippets of history that may support a current narrative. Donald Trump is the new Cyrus of the ancient world who encouraged Jews to return to Jerusalem, worship their God, and rebuild his temple. But unlike Cyrus, Trump is cruel and selfish. Cyrus built am empire on organization and merit promotion. 

President Trump is no Cyrus. Try and find similarities. 

As in 70 AD Israel will be betrayed again. Does that Arch of Titus not detail this at the start of the Forum Romanum? Will the American Christian Zionists be able to destroy the Done of the Rock, The third holiest Islamic shrine in the world? Will it take the provocation of raining missiles and drones on the carefully crafted status quo that accommodates all believers?


They (the Jews) are ready to build the third temple. It fits into their dispensational prophetic view quite nicely. But The Lord God of Israel always has his own way and must chuckle at the puny and pathetic way humans roll the dice to see the future. He's looking at you kid.

The saga of Palestine is not over yet. And Big Brother Peace Maker is a false prophet who will one day stand before the throne of God to account for much more than when his go to meal on Air Force One is. The man who hold up God's word upside down and cannot quote one verse deserves to be taught this one reference:

John 11.35 - Jesus Wept. Much we are also should as we watch the Middle East Yet ravaged by new conquerors.

Monday, November 24, 2025

Liberation Day spelled gloom and doom for most Americans putting food on the table. The only ones being "liberated" were billionaires and the lone Trillionaire Elon Musk. 

Sunday, November 23, 2025

Should people on Tik Tok or You Tube or any social media platform ask for viewers to send them gifts? This question raise a number of ethical questions, especially if the person asking is wealthier than the average American who cannot even afford to buy a modest home and who struggle to buy groceries and medications. 

Why is it that Thanksgiving and Christmas are the only times in the year that tug at the heart? Dickens wrote of Scrooge in the final passages of A Christmas Carol that he knew how to keep Christmas.

And this was a life lesson.

The blessing of Christmas is to ask for nothing and expect nothing. Jesus brought life. To the simple, humble shepherds. and the weathy kings from the east, the so called Magi. They came with Thanksgiving in their hearts. 

Monday, October 13, 2025

 My Story of Reverse Discrimination

In the fall of 2009 a full time position teaching history at the Community College became vacant. I had taught there as an adjunct since 1992 and had excellent evaluations. I was encouraged by my supervisor, Dr. Johnson, a black woman, to apply. I was a finalist with a colleague, a woman from India. I'm not even sure she was a citizen. I know she returned to India every year to see her family

I was send an email by my department chair, Dr. Johnson. Giving me and date and time of my interview. As it turned out this was wrong and I got there late! At any rate, several weeks later I met with the department head who told me that the position had been offered and was accepted by the Indian lady. She then told me that I was a victim. "we already have three white males and don't need another." She said my credentials were the best but none of that mattered. 

The bottom line: I was a white male with years of experience and the best background for te job! The next year I taught, as adjunct, five classes but only received compensation as an adjunct. 60% of the college is made up of adjuncts. 

Dr. Johnson told me that she got the department chair position only because she was black and was told at the time that there was no black department chair at the college. She was encouraged to apply. After I became very ill in 2011, the department had promoted a white professor to be supervisor but not department chair. It was, in my opinion, a window dressing to get out of presenting a very damning situation in general.

I knew, from that experience, that I would never be hired as a full time employee. I consulted a lawyer who was a personal friend and another friend who was a tenured full time professor at another university. Both agreed it was how the state operated.

I am a naturalized citizen, having come as an immigrant in my infant years to the United States. So happens my family was German. Not very popular as the US switched priorities to black and brown people. But my best complement came from a middle-aged white man who said on the last day of class, "we never knew your background, you politics, your religion." In other words, I tried to teach fairly and without any noticeable bias. 

And none of those criteria should be used for selecting a teacher. But I always prided myself on knowing American History better than most. After a stroke, a sloppy therapist wanted me to recite the months backwards. I countered, "sure, and can you do the same with American presidents?" I was judged to be surly. I'll take that. 

Friday, September 5, 2025

 And yet another attempt at the arcane. When is happening to Trump. The "war Department?" There were reasons This name change to the D4efense Department took place after World War II. But Trump has no understanding of history, does not read (probably never has) and is under the spell of ignorant haters like Stephen Miller, a real tribute to Duke University.

Changing a name does, in fact, change perceptions. That is who CBS has continuously been lambasted by Trump, so that they constantly have to go back and re-edit interviews. In every case it is to play to the Administration and the views of Trump's minions. Perceptions still matter but my suggestion is to use AI to get out of the hot seat and into the catbird seat. Instead of Trump dressed as a pope, Create AI tape, ripe for the Social Media plantforms, of him doing a Mass as if the pope. As they said of Teddy Roosevelt, "he wanted to be the bride at every wedding." A showman

But TR had class and was sincerely funny, especially when playing with his kids. Both men came from New York But TR reformed the police Department as commissioner. Trump is best known for his failed casinos. When ever he boasts he is Real Estate developer with a knowledge of deals "It's what I do..." people look over their shoulder. 

Let's help Afghanistan rebuild after the series of earthquakes and leave a Trump Tower as a signature card. Mr. Trump's goal should be a Trump Tower in ever capital of the world. (perhaps a way to assure the end of the Ukraine war, a Trump Tower in both Kiev and Moscow to seal any deal).  

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

  The Protestant View of Heaven: Are the Streets Really Gold?  M.Streich

In 1949, Ira F. Stanphill, a preacher in the Assemblies of God denomination, wrote the hymn “Mansion Over the Hilltop.” The chorus exemplifies the view of heaven as believed by most Christians:

 

“I’ve got a mansion just over the hilltop,

In that bright land where we’ll never grow old;

And someday yonder we will never more wander,

But walk the streets that are purest gold.”

 

Stanphill’s verses are not alone in depicting heaven as a city of gold full of mansions. A popular late 19th Century Methodist hymn by Edgar Stites refers to “…Beulah Land…where mansions are prepared for me…”

 

The Christian Belief of Mansions in Heaven

 

This popular belief derives from a mistranslation of the Gospel of John 14 2-3 that occurred during the creation of the King James Version of the Bible. None of the original sources of this passage refer to mansions. Scholars point to the use of the term “chateau” in French translations used to help produce the King James Version.

 

Based on original sources, the best translation seems to be, “In my father’s house are many resting places.” The German Reformer, Martin Luther, translated the passage as “Wohnungen” or places to live. The fact remains, however, that for Christians, heaven is a real place.

 

Human Models of Heaven

 

C. Austin Miles captured the human model of heaven in his early 20th Century hymn, “Dwelling in Beulah Land.” The skies are cloudless, the fountains never run dry, and manna is in “bountiful supply.” Similarly, the time of American slavery produced dozens of Spirituals depicting heaven as a place of freedom from the bondage of slavery. These Spirituals often utilized imagery from the Hebrew Exodus.

 

In John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, the journey of “Christian” is chronicled through a series of obstacles and temptations. In the end, however, he reaches the “Land of Beulah,” crosses the river, and is welcomed into the “Celestial City.” Heaven as a Celestial City is the hallmark of Christian images of the afterlife.

 

I Peter 3.22 speaks of Christ as being in heaven, “at the right hand of God.” Although Christians believe that God is omnipresent, they also refer to the “throne of God,” images taken from allegorical literature like the Apocalypse of St. John. Psalm 139.8 highlights this dilemma: God is in heaven yet also in “Sheol.” Francis Thompson’s poem, “The Hound of Heaven” classically describes the God of Heaven who is also the God of everywhere.

 

The Christian image of heaven is frequently criticized by those that question an absolute and eternal state of grace. Unlike C.S. Lewis’ Great Divorce, which emphasizes repentance for the travelers from the “Grey Town” to heaven, George Bernard Shaw’s Don Juan in Hell derides heaven as “the most angelically dull place in all creation.”

 

The Location of Heaven

 

Heaven was always thought to be beyond the reaches of earth. After the resurrection of Jesus, he ascended into heaven (Mark 16.19) and “sat down at the right hand of God.” In the Old Testament, the great prophet Elijah was taken by a “whirlwind to heaven…” (II King 2.1).

 

Throughout the ancient world the high place was the abode of God or the gods. The Psalmist writes, “I will life up my eyes to the mountains; From whence shall my help come?” (121.1) In Genesis 6, God prepares to blot out his creation when he “saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth.

 

The promise of heaven has served Christians for centuries as an eternal hope, especially when times are desperate. Whether an actual “place,” a state of the mind, or some notion of a parallel universe, heaven continues to reflect a worthy goal for many questioning the afterlife.

 

Sources:

 

Favorite Hymns of Praise, (Tabernacle Publishing Company, 1967)

New American Standard Bible (Chicago: Moody Press, 1973)

They Walked With God, Michael Williams, editor (Fawcett Publications, 1957)

 

Saturday, May 10, 2025

 

Ancient Hebrews -  Michael Streich

The Ancient Hebrews saw themselves as “God’s chosen people.” Their monotheism separated them from all surrounding neighbors while their belief in God’s covenants offered a positive relationship with deity and the promise of redemption for sin. Turned into slaves in Egypt, their history in the Old Testament recounts an Exodus to the land God had provided for them. As each generation was forced to confront sin and redemption anew, they were eventually overcome by powerful neighbors like the Assyrians and the Babylonians.

 Never again a truly antonymous nation until 1948, the Hebrews never lost their identity as a special people, blessed by a God who was forgiving and who promised the world the Messiah through the seed of Abraham. Hebrew Monotheism and the Covenant Promises According to Genesis, Abraham left Mesopotamia to follow a nomadic lifestyle in Palestine and to worship the one true God. In fact, it was this God – Yahweh, who called upon Abraham to begin life anew. The Ancient Near East had seen the rise and fall of kingdoms and empires, each with their own pantheon of gods and goddesses. These deities were unapproachable and often deemed vengeful. They reinforced the belief that ordinary men and women could never attain to their power or might. 

In contrast, Yahweh spoke to his people and declared himself the refuge of the people. The God of Abraham was both personal and forgiving. The Hebrew God established a special relationship with Abraham and his seed, hence the notion of a “chosen people.” This relationship corresponded to God’s covenants, beginning with Noah after the Genesis flood. Although understood to be unconditional, several prophets such as Amos and Hosea preached that God’s relationship was conditioned on righteous living and following his laws.

 Other Ancient Cultures Contrasted with the Hebrew View Abraham not only had a relationship with God, but that relationship, according to Genesis, was one-on-one; Abraham frequently “talked” with God. God even bargained with man as when Lot attempted to save his city from divine judgment. Such examples do not exist in other ancient societies where religious views held to a great divide between mortals and their deities. The Gilgamesh Epic is an excellent example of the arbitrary nature of the gods even when confronted by heroic mortals. In other cultures, gods and goddesses were placated by sacrifices yet even the best sacrifice was no guarantee of favor. Cyrus the Great, founder of the Persian Empire, was enlightened in his toleration of other prevailing beliefs and urged the Jews to return to Jerusalem to rebuilt their temple, but he never had the same kind of relationship with deity as did Abraham, Isaac, David, or Daniel. Hebrew law, however, paralleled the “eye-for-an-eye” laws of the Ancient Near East such as in the Code of Hammurabi.

 Other Differences in Ancient Hebrew History Unlike their neighbors, the Hebrews, initially, had no kings. Once in the Promised Land after their flight from Egypt, the people were led by judges. Additionally, prophets interpreted God’s covenants and chastened the people when their actions sought to emulate those of their neighbors. Eventually, after much clamoring, they were led by kings. But as the history of Israel demonstrates, kings often led immoral lives, permitting the people to adopt the worship of foreign gods – idols, and thereby inviting judgment. The Assyrians deported the ten “lost” tribes and the Babylonians eventually destroyed Jerusalem and the temple. Israel and Jewish Influences Continue to Endure in the 21st Century Perhaps the greatest difference between the Ancient Hebrews and other ancient Near East cultures is that it continues today through the nation-state of Israel, founded in 1948. Additionally, the ancient beliefs, customs, ceremonies, and promises are still a part of Jewish belief.

 The Hebrews also had a significant role in the development of Western beliefs, notably social justice. Yahweh, whose “name” has been linked to “El,” one of the earliest expressions of a male/female deity, gave rise to western monotheism as well as Islamic monotheism. Both Muslim and Christian ethics had ties to early Jewish beliefs. The Ten Commandments, hallmarks of early Hebrew belief which, according to Genesis, were given by Yahweh directly to Moses on Mt. Sinai, continue to be hotly debated in post-modern America as conservatives attempt to have them displayed at courthouses. Such strong influences attest to the durability of beliefs that began with Ancient Israel centuries ago.

Sources: John Barton and Julia Bowden, The Original Story: God, Israel, and the World (William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Co., 2004) Michael Grant, The History of Ancient Israel (Orion Publishing, 1984) Donald B. Redford, Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times (Princeton University, 1992) 


Tuesday, May 13, 2025

 

Consequences Of The Roosevelt - Taft Split In 1912

Theodore Roosevelt once said of William Taft, “He means well.” Long time friends, Taft became Roosevelt’s hand-picked successor in 1908, defeating the Democratic Party candidate William Jennings Bryan. Although Taft struggled to continue Roosevelt’s progressive agenda, he swiftly became his own man, influenced by members of his family and politically seduced by powerful men in the U.S. House and Senate. By 1912, the rift between Taft and Roosevelt was serious, resulting in Roosevelt’s challenge to a Taft reelection. Did Teddy Roosevelt choose the wrong man to follow him as President?

Taft Forged his own Presidential Policies and Sided with Roosevelt’s Enemies

Roosevelt was loved by Americans and esteemed by Europeans. After leaving the White House, “TR” traveled to Africa with his son Kermit and a large entourage to hunt on safari. Traveling to Khartoum in the Sudan, he met his wife and traveled down-river to Cairo, making the crossing to Europe where he was invited to meet kings, the pope, and even the German Kaiser who invited the popular former president to review troops.

Throughout his journeys, Roosevelt received letters from friends like Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, bemoaning the escalating faults of William Howard Taft. In Italy, Roosevelt met with Gifford Pinchot, an old friend and ardent environmentalist who had been dismissed by President Taft over conservation differences with Interior Secretary Richard Ballinger.

Although Taft’s one term realized substantial progressive victories, such as the Income Tax Amendment (16th) and the direct election of U.S. Senators (17th Amendment), he was unwilling to confront Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, the Republican stalwart who ran the Senate, or House Speaker Joseph Cannon. Taft never aspired to be President; his goal was to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Roosevelt’s Former Friendship Turns to Disaffection and Benefits Woodrow Wilson

Roosevelt returned to the United States on June 18, 1910 aboard the German liner Kaiserin Augusta Victoria and was greeted to a hero’s welcome. One of his friends at the New York arrival was Senator Lodge, who briefed him on Taft's lackluster leadership. Roosevelt would spend the next two years planning his return to the White House, refusing to support Taft’s reelection efforts.

In 1912, William Jennings Bryan stepped aside and worked to help nominate New Jersey Governor Woodrow Wilson as the candidate for the Democrats. Wilson was a staunch Presbyterian, former university professor, and president of Princeton University. He had no political experience and those that derided him referred to him as a Puritan or a “pilgrim.”

Wilson was an idealist whose favorite hymn was “How Firm a Foundation.” As President, he began every Cabinet meeting with prayer. Although a progressive, he opposed the direct primary, the regulation of public utilities, and corporate regulation. Wilson won the 1912 election only because Roosevelt ran as a third party candidate, receiving more popular votes than Taft, but failing to overcome Wilson’s 2 million lead in votes.

Had Roosevelt's Progressive Party candidacy not split the Republicans, Wilson might not have won the 1912 election. The combined total of Taft and Roosevelt was over 7.5 million votes.

Taft the Ironic Winner in American History

Of the three chief candidates in the presidential election of 1912, only Taft would realize his ultimate goal. Under the administration of Warren G. Harding, elected in 1920, Taft would be appointed Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. It was a position he coveted since his university days at Yale and the Cincinnati Law School.

Teddy Roosevelt died in January 1919. He was sixty and, having reconciled himself to the Republican Party, might have been the nominee in 1920. Roosevelt had criticized Wilson’s handing of World War I from the first shots fired in Europe in August, 1914. Wilson himself considered a third term in 1920 until a debilitating stroke ended that dream. When he received notification of TR's death, Wilson smiled.

Additionally, Wilson’s idealism of a world made “safe for democracy” was dealt a crushing blow at Versailles where the Allies, notably the French, dismissed his Fourteen Points. In the United States Senate, Wilson found strong opposition to his cornerstone program, theLeague of Nations. Senators like Foreign Relations Chairman Henry Cabot Lodge and William Borah despised the League as much as they despised Wilson.

Roosevelt’s Choice of Taft Led to the End of the Square Deal

Roosevelt’s activism during his first and second term as President was tempered by the reluctant and acquiescent Taft. In many ways, it was a difference in leadership style: both men sought the same goals but followed different methodologies based on their individual temperaments. Roosevelt the realist was more publicly successful. Taft’s accommodation with men like Aldrich was viewed as compromise and executive weakness.

The rift that led to the disastrous 1912 election in terms of Republican hopes elevated a moralist to the presidency. Wilson’s policies laid the foundation of Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal. The split in the Republican Party led to two factions, each stressing different ideologies of conservatism that continued well into the 20th Century.

Sources:

  • James Chace, 1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft & Debs – The Election That Changed the Country (Simon & Schuster, 2004)
  • Frank K. Kelly, The Fight For The White House: The Story of 1912 (Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1961)
  • Edmund Morris, Theodore Rex (Random House, 2001)
  • James Ford Rhodes, The McKinley and Roosevelt Administrations 1897-1909 (The Macmillan Company, 1922)
  • Page Smith, America Enters the World: A People’s History of the Progressive Era and World War I, Volume Seven (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1985)



Read more at Suite101: Consequences of 

Saturday, May 10, 2025

 

Ancient Hebrews -  Michael Streich

The Ancient Hebrews saw themselves as “God’s chosen people.” Their monotheism separated them from all surrounding neighbors while their belief in God’s covenants offered a positive relationship with deity and the promise of redemption for sin. Turned into slaves in Egypt, their history in the Old Testament recounts an Exodus to the land God had provided for them. As each generation was forced to confront sin and redemption anew, they were eventually overcome by powerful neighbors like the Assyrians and the Babylonians.

 Never again a truly antonymous nation until 1948, the Hebrews never lost their identity as a special people, blessed by a God who was forgiving and who promised the world the Messiah through the seed of Abraham. Hebrew Monotheism and the Covenant Promises According to Genesis, Abraham left Mesopotamia to follow a nomadic lifestyle in Palestine and to worship the one true God. In fact, it was this God – Yahweh, who called upon Abraham to begin life anew. The Ancient Near East had seen the rise and fall of kingdoms and empires, each with their own pantheon of gods and goddesses. These deities were unapproachable and often deemed vengeful. They reinforced the belief that ordinary men and women could never attain to their power or might. 

In contrast, Yahweh spoke to his people and declared himself the refuge of the people. The God of Abraham was both personal and forgiving. The Hebrew God established a special relationship with Abraham and his seed, hence the notion of a “chosen people.” This relationship corresponded to God’s covenants, beginning with Noah after the Genesis flood. Although understood to be unconditional, several prophets such as Amos and Hosea preached that God’s relationship was conditioned on righteous living and following his laws.

 Other Ancient Cultures Contrasted with the Hebrew View Abraham not only had a relationship with God, but that relationship, according to Genesis, was one-on-one; Abraham frequently “talked” with God. God even bargained with man as when Lot attempted to save his city from divine judgment. Such examples do not exist in other ancient societies where religious views held to a great divide between mortals and their deities. The Gilgamesh Epic is an excellent example of the arbitrary nature of the gods even when confronted by heroic mortals. In other cultures, gods and goddesses were placated by sacrifices yet even the best sacrifice was no guarantee of favor. Cyrus the Great, founder of the Persian Empire, was enlightened in his toleration of other prevailing beliefs and urged the Jews to return to Jerusalem to rebuilt their temple, but he never had the same kind of relationship with deity as did Abraham, Isaac, David, or Daniel. Hebrew law, however, paralleled the “eye-for-an-eye” laws of the Ancient Near East such as in the Code of Hammurabi.

 Other Differences in Ancient Hebrew History Unlike their neighbors, the Hebrews, initially, had no kings. Once in the Promised Land after their flight from Egypt, the people were led by judges. Additionally, prophets interpreted God’s covenants and chastened the people when their actions sought to emulate those of their neighbors. Eventually, after much clamoring, they were led by kings. But as the history of Israel demonstrates, kings often led immoral lives, permitting the people to adopt the worship of foreign gods – idols, and thereby inviting judgment. The Assyrians deported the ten “lost” tribes and the Babylonians eventually destroyed Jerusalem and the temple. Israel and Jewish Influences Continue to Endure in the 21st Century Perhaps the greatest difference between the Ancient Hebrews and other ancient Near East cultures is that it continues today through the nation-state of Israel, founded in 1948. Additionally, the ancient beliefs, customs, ceremonies, and promises are still a part of Jewish belief.

 The Hebrews also had a significant role in the development of Western beliefs, notably social justice. Yahweh, whose “name” has been linked to “El,” one of the earliest expressions of a male/female deity, gave rise to western monotheism as well as Islamic monotheism. Both Muslim and Christian ethics had ties to early Jewish beliefs. The Ten Commandments, hallmarks of early Hebrew belief which, according to Genesis, were given by Yahweh directly to Moses on Mt. Sinai, continue to be hotly debated in post-modern America as conservatives attempt to have them displayed at courthouses. Such strong influences attest to the durability of beliefs that began with Ancient Israel centuries ago.

Sources: John Barton and Julia Bowden, The Original Story: God, Israel, and the World (William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Co., 2004) Michael Grant, The History of Ancient Israel (Orion Publishing, 1984) Donald B. Redford, Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times (Princeton University, 1992) 


Read more at: https://www.shorthistory.org/ancient-civilizations/mesopotamia/israel-judea/ancient-hebrews-compared-to-other-ancient-near-east-cultures/

 

The Year Before America Entered the Great War

The War Between Labor & Capital Continued - Library of Congress: Goldstein Col
The War Between Labor & Capital Continued - Library of Congress: Goldstein Col
1916 witnessed the proliferation of jazz, silent movies, and better automobiles, but the war between labor and business continued, as did segregation.

1916 was an election year, producing a 62 percent turnout, one of the highest in history. The election saw Woodrow Wilson reelected, defeating Charles Evans Hughes, although in several state returns Wilson’s margin of victory was less than four percent. The election demonstrated that World War I, which had been raging since August 1914, was on many minds. It would be the last year of innocence before the war drums beat once again and the new century forced a redefinition of the U.S. presence in the world. Despite this, daily life continued unaltered, in some cases paving the way toward a different society. For many groups, however, full equality was a long journey into the future.

A Changing United States

Both Jack London and Henry James died in 1916 but a new breed of writers was making their way into the American psyche. Eugene O’Neill, acclaimed as one of the nation’s greatest dramatists, wrote “Bound East for Cardiff” while Theodore Dreiser, author of the ground-breaking novel Sister Carrie, contended with censors over newly written material. Despite the popularization of Jazz, Victorian morality still reigned, yet this did not stop Margaret Sanger from opening the first birth control clinic. It was the year bandleader Harry James and Dinah Shore were born.

The automobile was changing the travel habits of Americans and in 1916 the Thomas B. Jeffery Company in Kenosha, Wisconsin offered consumers an enclosed sedan good for “year-round motoring” at a cost of $1165.00 It was also the year Norman Rockwell sold his first two Post magazine covers, at the age of only twenty-two. Neither cover featured a war image. In Hollywood, D. W. Griffith finished Intolerance, an epic silent film with strong religious and ethical overtones.

The Battle Between Labor and Business Continued Despite Progressive Efforts

American workers were still battling for shorter hours and higher wages, even as the Adamson 8-Hour Act addressed the concerns of railroad workers. Despite the changes in social perceptions as seen in the popular literature and in the arts, domestic problems included “Pancho” Villa’s incursion into southern U.S. territory and the blowing up of a New Jersey munitions plant by German agents, an action that damaged the Statue of Liberty. and helped to solidify public opinion against Imperial Germany.

The progressive spirit, however, was still pervasive, proven, in part, by President Wilson’s nomination of Louis Brandeis to the U.S. Supreme Court. Brandeis, famously known for his unorthodox evidence in Muller v Oregon (1908), was the first Jew appointed to the high court, serving well into the FDR administration.

America’s Domestic Problems in 1916

But the calamities of Europe overshadowed any notion of carefree existence and change. While Paris was bombed by the first German Zeppelin raid, a strike by steel workers in Pittsburgh highlighted on-going labor disputes. Robert Minor’s drawing Pittsburgh, published in The Masses (1916), depicted a worker bent backward from the thrust of a bayonet. It was powerful and ironic that the worker was killed by a tool his own work probably manufactured.

Another pro-labor picture in the 1916 publication, Girls Wanted, coincided with the release of a public report detailing the findings in the investigation of the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire. Henry Glintenkamp’s seemingly innocent picture featured three young women huddled in conversation before the ruins of a building. The picture commented on the tragedy of the fire, child labor, and the exploitation of women in the workforce. 1916, however, witnessed the first woman elected to the U.S. Congress: Jeanette Rankin, Republican from Montana.

In the South, segregation was still the rule, but discrimination existed in the North as well. An October 7, 1916 item in the Cleveland Advocate refers to two “ill-kept Colored men” denied entrance to the Stillman Theater. “We do not call this discrimination,” the writer comments, “but rather an effort to exclude from the theater patrons whose deportment…made them undesirables.” The writer used the New Testament analogy of the parable about the man who wasn’t wearing a wedding garment when invited to the feast.

The Promise and Hope of Peace on Earth and Goodwill toward Men

As 1916 drew to a close, the chimes of New York’s Old Trinity Church began at ten minutes to midnight. Thousands gathered in the hope that the New Year would bring peace in Europe. Elsewhere, Secretary of War Baker expressed “profound gratitude” that the United States had, “preserved both its peacefulness and its honor.” (New York Times, December 31, 1916) Peace would also affect the U.S. economy: the 1916 credit balance with belligerent countries was $3,097,000,000.

In retrospect, 1916 was indeed a year of final innocence, despite those groups struggling to achieve their part of American democracy. The war came in 1917, sending American boys to the bloody trenches of Europe. While isolationism prevailed after the war, the U.S. would forever be entangled in alliances and focused on global actions impacting American security and prosperity. 1916 was the last year Americans could look within, without the fear of global threats.

Sources:

  • Meirion & Susie Harries, The Last Days of Innocence: America At War, 1917-1918 (Random House, 1997)
  • Jeff Nilsson, “Enemy Agents Strike New York – In 1916,” The Saturday Evening Post, July 7, 2010
  • Library of Congress archives
  • Page Smith, America Enters the War: A People’s History of the Progressive Era And World War I (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1985)

Wednesday, May 7, 2025

 How Social Security was Born: Not a Bonus, But a Guaranteed Retirement for all Americans Michael Streich

 

Formally known as the Wagner-Lewis-Doughton social security bill, the Social Security Act was passed by Congress June 19, 1935 and signed into law as immediate legislation by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Old age benefits were discussed by Roosevelt and key supporters who would hold positions in his administration before his 1933 inauguration. His Secretary of Labor, Frances Perkins, writes that Roosevelt, “…always regarded the Social Security Act as the cornerstone of his administration…” Not all Americans supported the measure, referring to the act as “socialism.” It is still considered controversial and falls under Congressional scrutiny whenever Republicans make significant gains in Congressional representation, as happened most recently in the 2010 midterm elections.

 

The Social Security Act Begins as an Unemployment Insurance Measure

 

During the heady days of FDR’s first Hundred Days, New York Senator Robert Wagner and Rep. David J. Lewis of Maryland approached Roosevelt with a rudimentary bill to provide unemployment insurance. Roosevelt, however, wanted to include social security. Concerns over benefits for America’s seniors arose out of the popularity of the Townsend Movement. This movement proposed generous old age pensions at federal expense.

 

The 1935 bill was the product of many lengthy committee hearings, unending hours of research, and continual brainstorming by FDR’s brain-trust. The initial measure included a health care plan, but this part of the bill was dropped as Roosevelt knew the medical establishment would oppose it, and the rest of the bill was not to be opened to the danger of failure.

 

Passing Social Security and Unemployment Insurance

 

Combining Social Security and unemployment benefits was the recommendation of Harry Hopkins, one of FDR’s key advisers. Unlike other New Deal programs, it was to be a permanent program and not deficit funded. Roosevelt stated, “We can’t sell the United States short in 1980 any more than in 1935.”

 

Roosevelt might have been astounded that in 1980, Ronald Reagan was elected President, beginning the tide of conservative ascendancy in the Congress. By 1985, into his second term, the Senate Budget Committee, led by New Mexico Senator Pete Domenici, recommended a one-year freeze on Social Security benefits.

 

As passed in 1935, Social Security was limited. During Committee hearings, Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau opposed a universal system, suggesting that rural farm workers be exempted as well as small businesses that employed less than ten people. Frances Perkins recounts in her memoirs, none of the provisions would completely solve the nation’s poverty, but it was the first step in solving future depression-condition problems.

 

Opposition to Social Security during the New Deal and Beyond

 

No emergency legislation will make an immediate difference without the necessary funding. Before Congress adjourned in the summer of 1935, Louisiana Senator Huey Long, one of Roosevelt’s most ardent critics, mounted a filibuster to stop any funding legislation. His filibuster lasted until adjournment and Roosevelt was forced to creatively look for temporary workers to help set up the newly independent agency.

 

Others, like Oklahoma Senator Thomas Gore, asked Secretary Perkins during a hearing “isn’t this like socialism?” The entire notion of “cradle to grave” federal entitlement reeked of socialism for stalwart GOP lawmakers. These views were vocally resurrected every time Congress expanded Social Security.

 

In 2010 and again in 2011, Social Security recipients received no cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) yet their Medicare contribution costs rose. In the 2010 midterm election, most seniors voted Republican.

 

Senator-elect Rand Paul of Kentucky campaigned on the promise that he opposes “any cuts in benefits for seniors” and “raising the Social Security retirement age…” Days after the election, however, he said “everything is on the table” to balance the budget. (ABC News, November 3, 2010)

 

National Health Care Tied to the Social Security Bill

 

Although Roosevelt cut health care from the 1935 bill, when Congress revisited Social Security in 1939 Senator Wagner attempted to add amendments, including a disability benefit. Congress voted down these expansions.

 

Wagner’s 1939 Health Bill was designed to expand unemployment benefits and Social Security. This was not a universal, federally mandated health plan such as found in other nations. Opting into the plan was not mandatory nor did his bill include forcing Americans to purchase health insurance.

 

Nevertheless, it was severely attacked, most notably by the American Medical Association and the pharmaceutical industry. Universal health care had been attempted since 1915 and was deemed a progressive measure. Not until March 2009 would Congress enact a health care bill that provided affordable coverage for all Americans.

 

The Role of Government during Periods of Economic Hard Times

 

Conservative Republicans led by President Herbert Hoover in the early years of the Great Depression abhorred federal intervention that amounted to any hint of welfare. Even Franklin Roosevelt rejected the government “dole.” But Roosevelt and the liberal Democrats believed that the role of the federal government was to stimulate the economy by putting people to work and providing safety mechanisms like unemployment insurance.

 

Advisers like Frances Perkins made the argument that even a minimal unemployment payout in the first weeks of unemployment would stop evictions and enable breadwinners to provide for their families.

 

Senator Wagner stated that, “Industry can not run with the mechanical perfection of a gyroscope and out of simple caution we must continue to devise methods of dealing with those who may be severed from their normal work despite our best efforts.”

 

Social Security provided one concrete method for ensuring the survival of American retirees. It continues to do so today. For most, the monthly payout represents a fixed income that covers the bare necessities. Any tampering with those benefits would be criminal to the millions who paid into the system all of their lives.

 

Sources:

 

Lewis L. Gould, The Most Exclusive Club (Basic Books, 2005)

J. Joseph Huthmacher, Senator Robert F. Wagner and the Rise of Urban Liberalism (Atheneum, 1968)

Frances Perkins, The Roosevelt I Knew (Viking Press, 1946 First Edition)